|
|
MY - PERSONAL BELIEFS >>
CONSPIRACIES- THEORY OR TRUTH
Scientific
Facts Point Towards Another Catastrophic Polar Shift!
It
is generally accepted that the Earth's crust "floats" on a turbulent molten
lava ocean. It is turbulent because the earth core is spinning faster than
the earth crust. Have you noticed that the wind and ocean currents spin
faster than the crustal land mass? The faster spinning center is pulling
the winds and tides around by its massive gravitational pull. Just beneath
our feet lies the source for every future volcano, earth quake, tsunami, and
polar shift. Any sense of absolute safety and security we might have about
the Earth is false. Anyone who has experienced an earth quake of 7 or above on
the Richter Scale will admit this to be an absolutely terrifying experience.
In a very brief moment, our true vulnerability and utter dependence upon the
earth for stability is revealed. And govt. is powerless to do anything about
it.
Science has
discovered a relationship between lunar phases (full moons)
and the occurance of earth quakes, volcanic eruptions, and tsunamis. This
evidence suggests that earth quakes, volcanos, tsunamis, and earth shifts
are more likely to occur around the time of extremely high tides. This
probably means that there is a "tide" in the lava ocean under the crust that
probably causes these events.
Albert
Einstein was "electrified" when he learned of Charles Hapgood's theory in
"Path of the Poles", whereby ice build-up at the polar caps
could eventually cause the crust to "slide" over the lava ocean until the
centrifugal force of the spinning Earth brought those ice caps around to the
equator. Geological evidence suggests that something like this has happened
repeatedly during the "life" of the planet; the magnetic poles seem
to have shifted at least 171 known times. In other words, a "critical
mass" of ice, coupled with an extremely high lunar
influence, may be all that is necessary to trigger the next
polar shift in the Earth's crust; leading to massive earth quakes,
volcanos, and tsunamis beyond the scope of our present imaginations. The
spinning earth core maintains its usual momentum, the magnetic poles
remain in place, but there appears to be a polar/earth shift because
the crust has slid over the magnetic poles! Charles Hapgood's theory has never
been disproven.
Much as we
hear about the ice melt-down at the poles due to climate change and global
warming (supposedly caused by the activities of mankind), this is not
in fact reducing the ice masses residing on polar land. The ice shelves
are breaking away rapidly, but these ice masses floating upon the ocean have
never added to any polar imbalance, and cannot cause a polar shift. On the
other hand, a rise of one degree in the polar air temperatures will actually increase
snowfall in those polar land regions simply because warm air is capable of
carrying and depositing more moisture than cold air. In other words, even as
the ice shelves are melting away, the land based snow, water, and ice
masses are building up even more rapidly in Antarctica and in
the northern areas of Greenland. This may very well be a natural and
reccurring phenomena. In fact, recent revelations seem to confirm that 2 miles
thick of pack ice on Antarctica has built up in as little as 4000 years! For
many years scientists thought Antarctica has been ice laden for hundreds of
thousands of years. They reasoned that each repeating pattern of ice rings
showing alternating packed snow and solid ice represented the annual seasons
of winter and summer. In other words, one ring pattern equaled one year. And
there are around 200,000 such rings in a 2 mile ice core sample. But recently
that has been brought into question. It seems that those ring patterns simply
represent snow/thaw/freeze cycles; cycles that can actually repeat themselves
several times in a single day! So, if there are only 75 such cycles in a year,
the entire 2 miles of ice and snow on Antarctica was deposited since 100 AD.
It is probably more likely, however, that 30 or 40 such cycles occur each year
placing the beginning of ice on Antarctica around 4000-5000 years ago.
Interestingly enough, this would roughly corespond to the hypothesis of a
polar shift occurring around that same time!
Why
is "magnetic north" not at the North Pole?
The
magnetic poles are several hundred kilometers away from true north and true
south. This may mean that the axis of the spinning center has a slight
gyroscopic "wobble", as well as spinning faster than the crust. Could
it be that this "wobble" dictates the speed of the spinning crust, and may
again throw the poles down to the equator at the appointed time? This is yet
another possible catalyst in bringing forward the next polar shift and
magnifying the effects of centrifugal force; sooner or later occurring at the
very time the mountain ring lines up with the lunar tides, and when the ice
masses at the poles have reached the critical level!
If the
center of the earth spins at a different rate to the crust, then the axis
points of the crust must have an opposite magnetic charge from the center.
The earth center is highly magnetic, but the crust achieves its opposite
magnetic charge via the electromagnetic currents created by its different rate
of spin. It is these opposite charges that "attract" each other, holding
the crust and center in a kind of equilibrium. What we perceive
to be "magnetic north" is in fact an "average" magnetic location/charge
derived by the confluence of the two opposite magnetic charges.
The
tremendous gravitational pull of the moon holds the crust in a more or less
perfect rotational axis, whereas the "wobble" of the earth center defines
(via the north/south electro-magnetic attraction) the speed of the crust
rotation. Because the crust holds only an electro-magnetic charge created by
the differential effect of the center, this is a charge/equilibrium that can
be relatively easily overcome by the combination of the other influences, such
as ice build up at the poles, solar/lunar tide convergences, and perfect
alignment of the "ring of fire" with the tidal surge. This unique
relationship has never been defined or published before! This also
explains why the magnetic poles seem to "wander" somewhat as the
electromagnetic charge of the crust varies due to cosmic or solar
electromagnetic "weather" conditions. Scientists have only recently predicted
the the sun's magnetic fields are due to shift around 2012. Is this just
another coincidence, or another potent potion to add to an already poisonous
brew?
|